@Ken Wesson: do you mean something like this: https://gist.github.com/747571
My fists stab at this technique looks kinda ugly though... Is there a way to somehow embed the trampoline inside the recursive definition? Is there a way to get the actual dispatch function other than (.dispatchFn multimethod) ? --Robert McIntyre On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote: > Hi, > > Am 19.12.2010 um 16:46 schrieb Ken Wesson: > >> If we had a (resolve-method multi & args) that resolved dispatch and >> then returned a fn that would call the method with those same args -- >> so ((resolve-method multi & args)) <=> (multi & args) -- then this >> could be used with trampoline in cases like Sunil is describing. > > It's called get-method. > > Sincerely > Meikel > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
