On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Stuart Halloway <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Several people had hands in that code, and the final result is all about > perf. Do not treat string.clj as a reference for idiomatic code. :-)
That's what I suspected. :-) Thanks Stuart! -John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
