On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Stuart Halloway <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Please don't. It has already been discussed and declined. The metadata is >>> uglier because we want doing this to be slightly ugly.. >> >> "We" do? Who is "we" and why does this "we" want doing this to be slightly >> ugly? > > The Clojure/core team is led by its technical advisors, Rich Hickey and > myself. In this particular case, I was on the fence and Rich called it.
OK, that answers the first question, but not the second. What was Rich's rationale? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en