On Jan 24, 2011, at 1:54 PM, Laurent PETIT wrote: > That's interesting. Indeed, it seems to me that the .close() call > should be wrapped by a try / catch with an empty catch.
Why would client code want an exception thrown by .close() to get swallowed? Is that not unexpected behavior in most cases? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
