Specifically, in ClojureCLR< property access in CLR interop is treated in the same way as fields and zero-arity methods.
For class properties, ClassName/PropertyName works. For instance properties, (.PropertyName instance) or (. instance PropertyName) In essence, fields, properties and zero-arity methods are referenced in the same way, and are checked in this order. You can also access the getter/setter methods of a property directly. (get_PropertyName and (set_PropertyName) Where properties are not handled is in type/interface specification/ implementation. Specifically, places that allow method definition (gen-interface and company) and places that allow method definition (deftype and company) do not allow specification of properties. Technically, this is quite easy. The difficutly is that the syntax of these macros typically do not make it easy to distinguish the intent of defining properties versus defining zero-arity methods. This is discussed more fully at https://github.com/richhickey/clojure-clr/wiki/Extending-deftype-and-company-for-CLR. I still need to come up with a good mechanism for referring to events. Suggestions welcomed. --David On Feb 2, 9:09 pm, "Matthew D. Swank" <akopa.gmane.pos...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 1, 6:10 pm, "Matthew D. Swank" <akopa.gmane.pos...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > AFAIK clojure-clr doesn't have built-in support for accessing > > properties. > > Ok David Miller let me know off list the existing interop handle > properties. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
