On 17 February 2011 13:54, Zhenchao Li <cockneyke...@gmail.com> wrote: > By the way, when deploying the project it seems compojure somehow uses > java.rmi.server.UID if you use compojure.handler, and on app engine > java.rmi.server.UID is not usable. I'm using ring.middleware to > construct a proper usable handler for appengine, like this: (Almost > the same as (site index) except that I don't use wrap-multipart, which > probably uses that package)
I'm working on a rewrite of wrap-multipart-params that should work on locked down environments like Google App Engine, as well as maintaining backward compatibility. You'll also be able to specify custom storage backends, e.g. uploading multipart files directly to an S3 bucket. When I have something usable, I'll create a thread on the Ring group to discuss it. - James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
