On Feb 24, 2011, at 5:58 PM, .Bill Smith wrote: > I don't know, but if you introduce breaking changes, you'd better name it > version 2.0.
;-) It'd actually be nice to establish a stable groupId and artifactId for the project (rather than the constantly-shifting `org.clojars.github-username-here`), which in conjunction with breaking changes, would warrant dropping back to v0.x.y until those changes have proven themselves. - Chas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
