On Feb 24, 2:48 am, Paul Richards <paul.richa...@gmail.com> wrote: > My goodness.. Seems like a can of worms. :p > > I think I'll pick something at least two levels deep like > "pauldoo.someproject", complete with ".core" and ".tools" as sub > namespaces..
IMO adding ".core" indicates it's a "filler" segment that's only there to get around the fact that you shouldn't have single-segment namespaces. If you've already got two levels, there's no need for a .core segment. -Phil -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
