I had a think about using Clojure rather than go to a separate
template system. Here's a horrible hack that uses eval to support
string templates:
(ns clj-template.core
(:require [clojure.contrib.string :as string]))
(defn remove-templating [s]
(string/replace-re #"#" "\"" s))
(defn build-code [s]
(str "(str \"" (remove-templating s) "\")"))
(defmacro foreach [loop-stuff & body]
`(apply str
(for ~loop-stuff
(str ~@body))))
(defn eval-template [s]
(-> (build-code s)
read-string
eval))
In the templates anything surrounded by #'s (hashes) is a clojure form
that should be a compatible argument to str.
On Mar 29, 3:13 pm, B Smith-Mannschott <bsmith.o...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> (defn constructor
> [{:keys [class-name fields] :as cfg}]
> [" " class-name "(" (formal-params cfg) ") {\n"
> (statement-list
> (for [f fields]
> [" this." f " = " f ]))
> " }\n"])
>
Then becomes:
(eval-string "
public Example(#(format-params cfg)#)
{
#(foreach [f fields]#
this.#f# = #f#;
#)#
}")
The general idea might be applicable to what you want.
Saul
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
