On Apr 5, 2011, at 8:35 PM, Ambrose B wrote: > One thing I was confused about in the 1.1-betas was the boolean return value > of tests seemed random. ie. tests that pass don't always return true.
Yes, there's no specified connection between `fact` return values and whether the test(s) passed or failed. I have it on my list to make such a connection, just because people expect it. ----- Brian Marick, Artisanal Labrador Contract programming in Ruby and Clojure Occasional consulting on Agile www.exampler.com, www.twitter.com/marick -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
