Thanks for the responses. On 3 May 2011 17:39, Steve Miner <stevemi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On May 3, 2011, at 7:08 AM, David Jagoe wrote: > > For your specific purpose, I would be careful about using a map as an > "entity" specification. If the order is significant, a vector of field > specifiers would be better. Instead of taking a map as the second argument > to defentity, you could make it variadic like (defmacro defentity [ent & > specs] ...).
Yes, that looks like the solution. Thanks again. David > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
