On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Armando Blancas <armando_blan...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Having no clue what to make of 0.0.1 precisely w.r.t. its previous > versions numbers, I gathered it's because you can't make out anybody's > modules anyway, in which I agree.
Well, the previous modules didn't really have version numbers independently (which was part of the problem that Clojure/core have addressed with this new approach). Each new contrib library has started with a pre-1.0.0 version to indicate they are works in progress which is in line with semantic versioning. Read the various subsections here for more detail on versioning: http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/How+to+Make+Releases - in particular: "Clojure/core team must approve first 1.0.0 release". -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://www.getrailo.com/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
