On May 21, 2011, at 6:47 PM, mike.w.me...@gmail.com wrote: > This is a *different* problem than the one being solved, which is getting an > accurate representation of the structure of the code. In particular, it's > different enough that I don't think it makes the required list for a minimal > "getting started with clojure" package. So it'd be nice to offer, but it > being missing or a bit painfull isn't a show-stopper.
We've really beaten this into the ground, but at least this makes our positions clear: if this feature is missing it does stop my show, and I understand that it doesn't stop yours. People can take that all for what it's worth. Thanks, -Lee -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
