> (nth [] 0) also throws an exception, so it is not so surprising. Thanks guys, just checked, rand-nth as a wrapper around nth inherits its semantics. So the question should rather be why nth throws an exception while get not. Out of curiosity I checked (peek []), returns nil too.
jarek -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But in practice, there is. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
