> > > What's the point of the sugared version? It's not any less to type. > > Actually there's one fewer character -- a space. >
Okay, I'll give you that. > > It's also incomprehensible to me how it came about. In the middle one > > it's simple, class and method, but the in sugared one it's just plain > > simply bizarre looking. What was the intent? > > It's closer to typical function-call form: (.doSomething someNoun) > resembles (do-something some-noun) more than does (. someNoun > doSomething). > Right. That makes sense. I see the consistency here now. :-) Thanks. Soldiering on now; I'll probably be back. :-D -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
