On Jun 17, 2011, at 3:44 AM, Konrad Hinsen wrote: > Java methods aren't even first-class objects (nor, in fact, objects at all) > in the Java world. Clojure can hardly do better than Java in unifying things > at the JVM level. The one thing that you can do with a method in Java is call > it, and the same limitation applies in Clojure.
Why would it have to be done at the JVM level? Couldn't the Clojure compiler generate an anonymous function whenever it sees a Java method? I presume it currently doesn't do this for performance reasons. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
