On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote: > Both of them. But the context of that phrase originally was "used once > in the middle of a symbol", so it was referring to symbols with only > one /.
Which is the whole point: the docs ascribe meaning to a/b and to / but do not ascribe meaning to a/b/c So the question still remains: is a/b/c supposed to be a valid symbol and, if so, is it "a/b" and "c" or is it "a" and "b/c"? Current behavior suggests "a/b" and "c" but it's not clear whether that's by design or thru an accident of implementation. -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://www.getrailo.com/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
