On Jul 9, 2011, at 8:47 AM, Brian Hurt wrote: > If there is an obvious way to rewrite the code using doseq or fold (or reduce > or map or etc), then yes- you should do it. However, if this way to rewrite > the code isn't obvious in 10 seconds of thought, don't worry about it. Use > loop/recur. The goal is clear, concise code- not blind obedience to > aphorisms.
I think Christian wanted to know *why* one "should" eliminate recur. I can't think of a reason to avoid it myself, though I also don't recall hearing any recommendations against using recur. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
