Hello. Thank you for giving your opinion, Rasmus.
Indeed, (doc doc) says, "I am for a var or special form." However, according to (source doc), there is some code for namespace, and this code won't be used since (ns-resolve) breaks its promise. Moreover, with 1.2.1, (doc) uses (print-namespace-doc) internally! And... I hesitate to say but... (print-namespace-doc) seems to be removed in 1.3. So I think we also should update docstring of (doc), right? Thanks. -- Name: OGINO Masanori (荻野 雅紀) E-mail: masanori.og...@gmail.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
