Oh yeah, fair enough. I'm not convinced though. I don't see :? changing as such, as well as I think the syntactical representation below is just as confusing... I'll rest this case :) It's not all that useful anyway.
On 19/07/2011, at 2:38 PM, Sean Corfield wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Andreas Kostler > <andreas.koestler.le...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> (-> "x" >>> (#(str "y" % "z")) >>> (#(str "a" % "b")) >>> println) >> Here, the meaning of % changes?!? > > Not really, each #() is a scope for % as if it read: > > (-> "x" > ((fn [x] (str "y" x "z"))) > ((fn [c] (str "a" c "b")) > println) > -- > Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN > An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ > World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ > Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://www.getrailo.com/ > > "Perfection is the enemy of the good." > -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
