Stu,
Try:
(ns myfuns
(:require
(foo.baz [a :as a]
[b :as b]
[c :as c]))
Cheers,
- Chas
On Jul 20, 2011, at 12:36 AM, stu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In larger Clojure projects with nested namespaces I've found there are
> less namespace pollution issues if I avoid (ns... :use...) forms in
> preference to (ns... :require...) forms. This approach sometimes
> leads to namespace constructs like:
>
> (ns myfuns
> (:require
> [foo.baz.a :as a]
> [foo.baz.b :as b]
> [foo.baz.c :as c...]))
>
> Is there an idiomatic way of coalescing these :require clauses into
> a :require "farm" that can be simply :require'd or is this the wrong
> way to manage namespaces in Clojure projects?
>
> Any advice much appreciated,
>
> Stu
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
