thanks Miekel, Bennyand Ken for your responses.. Sunil. On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Sunil S Nandihalli < sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everybody, > > I have a situation where I know that the sequence I have at hand is sorted > but does not implement the Sorted interface. How can I use subseq for > example on a vector without actually creating a sorted-set out of it which I > think may be wasteful.. Am I mis-informed about creation of sorted-set being > wastefull? If I am right in assuming what I said above, how can efficiently > make something like following work? can I like just implement Sorted for > Vector in the namespace I am working in? > > (subseq [1 2 3 4] < 3) > > thanks, > Sunil. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
