On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Ken Wesson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Aaron Cohen <[email protected]> wrote: > > I may be wrong, but don't you need to swap the order of the arguments to > f? > > You can do that by writing f itself appropriately. Usually either it > will be a closure or it won't matter (core +, etc.). > > If the order of evaluation doesn't matter, you should probably just be using reduce in the first place. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
