Thanks for the clarification. I see I was mixing up various concepts in my head.
On Jul 29, 8:19 am, Alex Osborne <a...@meshy.org> wrote: > Clojure has some of those features, but it is sufficiently different > from the traditional model that I would consider "not particularly OO" a > valid, if not particularly useful description. There are certainly > similarities though, after all Clojure tries to solve similar problems. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
