On Jul 29, 8:58 am, Michael Gardner <gardne...@gmail.com> wrote: > > An atom would be more appropriate, unless you're coordinating updates to the > tree with updates to some other ref.
Ah, for some reason that didn't occur to me, thanks. Since the tree in this case acts as a supporting index on spatial data, it pretty much defers to the outcome of any updates to the original entities. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
