28k after gclosure compilation is not insane considering that cljs.core is above 350K. ClojureScript needs some runtime code afterall and that at some point cannot get compressed/slashed away endlessly. ClojureScript will take some footprint but the gclosure compiler does a great job here to slice away stuff that's not needed.
You cannot really compare a straight simple js implementation with it's ClojureScript equivalent. These are totally different beasts. The gain will be more obvious with more complex apps running in the browser. Look in the example folder for the twitterbuzz. It's nearly 700 lines. Not sure you would like to code that directly in JavaScript:) (I would not) Luc P. On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 11:21:08 +0300 Sergey Didenko <sergey.dide...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, after compiling this example and its raw Google Closure > equivalent: > > (ns bgcolor > (:require [goog.fx.dom :as fx-dom])) > > (defn ^:export animate [elem start end] > (let [ > anim (fx-dom/BgColorTransform. elem start end 2000)] > (.play anim ()))) > > > After compilation through the Google compiler ? > > > > > -- Luc P. ================ The rabid Muppet -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
