Hi Meikel,Ken Thank you so much for taking the time to reply to my question. Meikel Thanks for the code. I will implement as described above.
On Sep 18, 6:28 pm, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote: > Hi Eamonn, > > if you find this too tedious to write and use it quite often, then there is > always the possibility to hide things a little bit behind a facade. > > class Clj { > static final Var seqVar = RT.var("clojure.core", "seq"); > static final Var keywordVar = RT.var("clojure.core", "keyword"); > static final Var hashMapVar = RT.var("clojure.core", "hash-map"); > > static Object seq(Object x) { return seqVar.invoke(x); } > static Object kw(String n) { return keywordVar.invoke(n); } > static Object kw(String n1, String n2) { return keywordVar.invoke(n1, > n2); } > static Object hashMap(Object... args) { return > hashMapVar.applyTo((clojure.lang.ISeq)seq(args)); } > > } > > This would make names a little bit more meaningful (less “invoke”s) for the > functions you use most. And you might use your own function names. Of course > this won't reach the sugar you get from Clojure itself. > > theMap = Clj.hashMap(Clj.kw("a"), 1, Clj.kw("b"), 2); > foo.invoke(Clj.kw("a"), theMap); > > This translates directly into: > > (let [the-map (hash-map :a 1 :b 2)] > (foo :a the-map)) > > It should be easy to understand what's going on despite the noise. I believe > Java devs are used to noise. > > And FWIW: Not quoting "13rabc" by accident in the other scenario will not > result in the Reader complaining but puzzled looks where this magical value > came from. I personally don't particular like these moments. > > My 0,02€. YMMV. > > Sincerely > Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en