Hi Meikel,Ken
Thank you so much for taking the time to reply to my question.  Meikel
Thanks for the code.  I will implement as described above.

On Sep 18, 6:28 pm, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote:
> Hi Eamonn,
>
> if you find this too tedious to write and use it quite often, then there is 
> always the possibility to hide things a little bit behind a facade.
>
> class Clj {
>     static final Var seqVar = RT.var("clojure.core", "seq");
>     static final Var keywordVar = RT.var("clojure.core", "keyword");
>     static final Var hashMapVar = RT.var("clojure.core", "hash-map");
>
>     static Object seq(Object x) { return seqVar.invoke(x); }
>     static Object kw(String n) { return keywordVar.invoke(n); }
>     static Object kw(String n1, String n2) { return keywordVar.invoke(n1, 
> n2); }
>     static Object hashMap(Object... args) { return 
> hashMapVar.applyTo((clojure.lang.ISeq)seq(args)); }
>
> }
>
> This would make names a little bit more meaningful (less “invoke”s) for the 
> functions you use most. And you might use your own function names. Of course 
> this won't reach the sugar you get from Clojure itself.
>
> theMap = Clj.hashMap(Clj.kw("a"), 1, Clj.kw("b"), 2);
> foo.invoke(Clj.kw("a"), theMap);
>
> This translates directly into:
>
> (let [the-map (hash-map :a 1 :b 2)]
>   (foo :a the-map))
>
> It should be easy to understand what's going on despite the noise. I believe 
> Java devs are used to noise.
>
> And FWIW: Not quoting "13rabc" by accident in the other scenario will not 
> result in the Reader complaining but puzzled looks where this magical value 
> came from. I personally don't particular like these moments.
>
> My 0,02€. YMMV.
>
> Sincerely
> Meikel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to