On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Islon Scherer <islonsche...@gmail.com> wrote: > type would be Object, and you would have to typecast it anyway. (Maybe with > scala's extremely fancy type system you can create a generic first function > a la clojure but the type signature would make my eyes hurt :)
oh boy. if you think you have to typecast it, then you are using scala very wrong! now, i'm not a big fan of all the ascii overhead in scala, so like you say yes the eyes being to hurt -- i'm not saying that it is easy for people to get into the scala mindset and to understand how to really use it. BUT please nobody think that scala is trying to force you to do runtime typecasing. noooooo way! sincerely. :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
