Cheshire looks great, thanks for the tip! I wonder, then, what's the OP's problem? I think it's good to have a lightweight, 100% Clojure version of JSON in contrib. A lighter weight is often a higher priority than performance. I think both approaches have their place.
In the Java world, too, there's the option of using the slower, simpler reference implementation of JSON. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
