Cool! I did some quick-and-dirty benchmarking of it this afternoon (GMT+2) and got between 50 and 70 MiB/s on my machine. The Apache implementation used for comparison by the unit tests came in at between 30 and 40 MiB/s. Impressive.
I've since seen perf_base64.clj go in, though I'm not clear on how it's intended to be used as it's not actually used by test code, though it is in the test tree. I thought I'd get c.c.base64 wired up with swank-clojure since that's my usual way of working and start exploring. (That was an hour ago.) I've now got it working (tl;dr: parent 0.0.25 brings clojure 1.3.0; swank 1.3.3 needs plugin 1.3.8). See also https://github.com/bpsm/clojure.data.codec/commit/5c285928e5362ab73bfb5a01e2df0d7542bb64d0 So, now I'm ready to explore. Yea! :) (* Other topic: To Stewart's recent question about encouraging more use of Clojure's bleeding edge for more timely feedback: I suspect it's this kind of death-by-a-thousand-paper-cuts dependency foul-ups that make one gunshy about staying on the bleeding edge. With swank-clojure, clojure-maven-plugin, clojure, clojure-mode.el in my tool chain, I've grown reluctant to stay on the bleeding edge even for projects without library dependencies. The 1.1->1.2 transition was already rocky for me because of tooling issues. What do the Clojure devs themselves do to keep their dev environment productive? Use ed and a raw repl running in two xterms? ;-) *) On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:08, Alexander Taggart <m...@ataggart.ca> wrote: > > > On Sunday, 9 October 2011 19:49:17 UTC-7, Stuart Sierra wrote: >> >> Clojure unless somebody clever can make one that's actually *faster* than >> the best Java lib. > > Here ya go: https://github.com/ataggart/clojure.data.codec > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
