On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Wilker <wilkerlu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In the case of <> it's ok because they are reverse of each other, but in
> some circustances there is no reverse function, and you finish can't be
> using partial, instead you do like:
>
> (take-while #(< % 2000) primes)
>
> I mean, there is no such function on default that works as reversed
> arguments partial (appending partial arguments at end instead of beginning)?

I was expressing a need for exactly this function the other day on
IRC. I jokingly called it 'impartial' :)
-- 
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/
Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://www.getrailo.com/

"Perfection is the enemy of the good."
-- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to