Perhaps "idiot-magic" would sub? On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Sergey Didenko <sergey.dide...@gmail.com> wrote: > I coded mutable Dejkstra algorithm isolated in a single function, > because it's easier for me to maintain it - I used to write a lot of > mutable algorithms. But I consider this code not idiomatic though > useful in my case. > > So I think idiomatic Clojure code is not as ubiquitous as you probably > mean and the word "idiomatic" is quite useful for discussions. > >> In fact I challenge anyone to give an example of the least >> idiomatic code written in Clojure (using Java interop is cheating). > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
