Hi, Why keep both butlast and drop-last in clojure.core? The latter has the advantage that it's lazy and can drop off more than one element from the end of a seq. In contrast, I can't think of any advantage of butlast, except that it seems to be slightly (ca 20%) faster than (doall (drop-last x)). Wrapping drop-last in a doall should not be normally necessary, though.
Should butlast be deprecated? Thanks, Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
