On Dec 20, 2011, at 12:11 PM, David Nolen wrote:

> If you look at the Compiler.java at the specified line in the exception it 
> shouldn't be too hard to see what's going on. The Compiler looks for :line in 
> the metadata on the form. In 1.3 literals are long so it seems likely that 
> Longs are being attached to the form. Just make sure if you are attach :line 
> metadata that you wrap with (Integer. n)

Thanks!

> I'm skeptical this affects 1.2. As far as why you don't see any compiler 
> errors with the fully macroexpanded form I suspect that the metadata 
> swizzling is happening during expansion.

Yes. I was just adding 1.4 to the backwards-compatibility suite and noticed a 
bug. The change-clojure-version script wasn't changing part of the suite - the 
part I put the Long->Int regression test in. Sigh.

-----
Brian Marick, Artisanal Labrador
Now working at http://path11.com
Contract programming in Ruby and Clojure
Occasional consulting on Agile


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to