On Dec 21, 12:03 pm, Jonas <[email protected]> wrote: > You can also do (.. boxWidget GetProp3D (SetUserTransform t)) or (-> > boxWidget .GetProp3D (.SetUserTransform t))
Well, neither of these are strictly equivalent to his original code, which returns the boxWidget; yours return the result of SetUserTransform. However, the option to leave off the parens, or use .. instead are both still valid. Leaving off the doto might be valid also, if he doesn't care about the return value. FWIW, I don't really care for .. - my understanding is it's fallen out of favor: it was added in the bad old days before -> existed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
