Quoth Louis Yu Lu on Boomtime, the 70th of The Aftermath: > The proposed syntax sugar apparently pleases my eyes and fingers > from conventional languages. With some experiments, I found the code > is more readable for me to use f(x) notation for function call, and > (op x) for operator.
It sounds like you're interested in M-expressions [1]; anyone care to implement M-expressions for Clojure as reader macros [2]? Footnotes: [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-expression [2] https://github.com/klutometis/reader-macros -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
