(+ 3) already has a meaning in Clojure. It's an expression whose answer is 3. How is Clojure supposed to read your mind and know that you want the output to be a function there?
Similarly, would (+ 3 2) be 5, or would it be the curried function of + applied to 3 and 2 and waiting for more parameters? In any case, there's no way to get Haskell's behavior and also get things like: sane errors when you pass a function too few arguments functions that can take any number of arguments -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
