Hi, Am 03.01.2012 um 12:16 schrieb Cedric Greevey:
> Breaking changes are bad enough without making some of them > gratuitous. They could have just renamed the namespace without also > renaming some of the individual functions. :) One could also argue the other way around: When we break things already, we can break it really hard and also clean up inconsistent naming of functions and such. Then you have the pain of a breaking change only once. That said: I don't know whether considerations like this were the case here. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
