Mark Engelberg <mark.engelb...@gmail.com> writes:
> I believe it is a bug that:
> (#{true false} false) yields false
> whereas
> (contains? #{true false} false) yields true
>
> Can someone confirm or deny this?
It's intentional that calling a set as a function returns the argument
if it's a member. Part of the reason contains? exists is so that you can
find out whether nil is a member of a set.
-Phil
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
