First: Thanks all for your thoughts. Second: I have the same question as Allen (why would the doseq variant be faster in this case?)
Finally: so I guess that what I did was also OK then? Jm On Jan 20, 9:57 pm, Alan Malloy <a...@malloys.org> wrote: > But I don't see any reason why this would be faster than (dorun (map > side-effect-fn s1 s2 s3)). You're creating and then dismantling a > three-element vector at every iteration to no purpose. > > On Jan 20, 12:40 pm, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > to add to Lars answer: > > > (doseq [[a b c] (map vector s1 s2 s3)] > > (side-effect-fn a b c)) > > > This should do the trick. > > > Sincerely > > Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
