Sean Neilan <s...@seanneilan.com> writes: > Should I trust the readme for swank-clojure, the dev.clojure.org > site, the comments on dev.clojure.org, the blog post at > technomancy.us/149 or the radically simplified setup here?
The swank-clojure readme should be the most reliable. You may find a better explanation of how all the pieces fit together elsewhere, but for swank-clojure itself, trust the readme. > can I trust the part about how swank-clojure is available as an emacs > package? No, that's very old. Where are you seeing it? > Also, somebody somewhere else said there are issues with swank-clojure > 1.4.0 and that I should use 1.3.x instead. Do you remember any details? For a time the 1.4.0-SNAPSHOT was behind on the elisp payload stuff, but it should be fine now. -Phil -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
