Forgot to add these: http://dev.clojure.org/display/community/Clojure+Success+Stories http://www.quora.com/Whos-using-Clojure-in-production
> Your point is clear and valid but isn't it a bit harsh to write the > response in a tone like this? After all we are asking and answering > questions here, it's not like something is going to change after one > request. > > BTW it is nice to hear Clojure being reliable enough in people's eyes to be > used in such a serious application. > > On Saturday, March 24, 2012 2:17:57 PM UTC+2, Luc wrote: > > > > I would suggest that we introduced some klingon characters in the language, > > we could then satisfy all these alien desires to change a syntax that has > > been > > established 4 years ago. > > > > We have a product driving an hospital here, your "esthetic" considerations > > do not > > fit in my deployment plan. This is not a toy language anymore... That era > > is behind > > us since Jan. 2009. > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- Softaddicts<lprefonta...@softaddicts.ca> sent by ibisMail! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
