Hi Chris, yes I have seen crate. But I wanted something where I can share the same view code and use it on the client and the server and use the same api. I also think Hiccup's aproach to generate html strings at compile time is quite nice. That way the deconstruction of [:div#id.class] stuff can be done at compile time.
Thanks anyway. I'm looking at add-optional-attrs in your lib. Maybe that can get me further ... Roman. On Saturday, April 7, 2012 9:32:38 PM UTC+2, Chris Granger wrote: > > Have you seen Crate? > > http://github.com/ibdknox/crate > > On Apr 7, 1:18 pm, r0man <roman.sche...@burningswell.com> wrote: > > Hello ClojureScripters, > > > > I started to port the Hiccup library to ClojureScript. The goal > > is to have a port of Hiccup that has exactly the same api. This > > would make it possible to write views once (provided no platform > > specific code is used), and run them on the server with Clojure > > and on the client with ClojureScript. > > > > At the moment I copied most of the Clojure files and made some > > modifications where necessary. The whole Hiccup testsuite runs > > fine in the browser, as well in a headless v8 session. > > > > However I have one last hurdle to take. Most macros I can use in > > Clojure and in ClojureScript with some minor adjustments, except > > the "defelem" macro in the "hiccup.def" namespace. To get this > > one running in ClojureScript I had to change it's implementation > > and move it to the "hiccup.macro" namespace. > > > > The problem with this macro is, that it uses the alter-var-root > > fn to add additional functionality to the given fn. As far as I > > can tell there is no alter-var-root in ClojureScript. I got the > > code running by using set! in the ClojureScript version. > > > > The original Clojure macro: > > > > https://github.com/r0man/hiccup/blob/clojurescript/src/clj/hiccup/def... > > > > > The ClojureScript macro: > > > > https://github.com/r0man/hiccup/blob/clojurescript/src/clj/hiccup/mac... > > > > > Is anyone aware of a solution that would share the same code and > > work in both cases? Are there plans to add alter-var-root to > > ClojureScript as well? > > > > Thanks, Roman. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
