I've read in some recent posts that Clorujians prefer data to APIs. I'm not sure I understand what this means, in practice. When I'm in the early stages of developing an application, the data structures undergo a great deal of change. One of the ways, I isolate parts of the code from these sorts of changes is by writing accessor functions. Maybe this is OO thinking but it seems to me a wise application of DRY.
Would these accessor functions be considered an API? If so, why should I prefer accessing the raw data structure? If not, what is constitutes an API? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
