Aha! Thanks for explaining this here as well as in detail on IRC and
working through it with me. It does indeed make sense.
Furthermore, we've already had this discussion on IRC, but at least one
person thought that my suggestions above were me being a jerk. Just wanted
to publicly state here that it was absolutely *not* my intention and if it
came off that way, I very much apologize.
On Saturday, May 12, 2012 12:18:04 AM UTC-5, Walter Tetzner wrote:
>
>
> It looks like you have written a little mini-library for creating and
>> working with association lists. Why on earth would you use association
>> lists instead of mas? The seq representation of a map is basically the
>> same.
>>
>> user=> (seq {"foo" "bar"})
>> (["foo" "bar"])
>> user=> (into {} (seq {"foo" "bar"}))
>> {"foo" "bar"}
>>
>
> The reason for using association lists is that query strings are not
> maps. You can have duplicate keys, and order can matter.
>
> Second thing is your (ns ..) declarations.
>>
>
> I'll take these suggestions into consideration.
>
> - This one is entirely personal and totally subjective, but man, I
>> hate copyright headers in files. Putting it in the README should
>> suffice, right? I don't like having to scroll down to get to
>> code. I imagine this entirely personal opinion, but I wanted to
>> complain about it regardless. :)
>>
>
> I'm not entirely sure how I feel about this yet. I probably won't
> change it any time soon.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
