I originally assumed core.logic would be the key to symbolic math, but now I feel that's not really the case. You still need to implement all the algebra manipulation algorithms as usual. One can define the numbers in a different way as Ambrose did in his talk, but I imagine we would need to have much different performance expectations when performing the other symbolic operations. That being said, I would like to see more work going into that type of implementation.
On Thursday, May 24, 2012 8:37:57 PM UTC-4, Zack Maril wrote: > > Off topic: > How hard would it be to build on > core.logic<https://github.com/clojure/core.logic#corelogic>to do math > functions? > -Zack > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
