Thanks, it was get-in that I was looking for, but couldn't find. Also 
thanks to Dave for explaining that keywords have some internal magic 
compared to strings. will remember!

On Thursday, 31 May 2012 19:22:50 UTC+2, Alan Malloy wrote:
>
> Yes, but really to GET a value nested IN a series of maps, he should 
> just be using get-in, rather than threading anything at all. 
>
> On May 31, 7:59 am, Dave Ray <dave...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > Keywords implement IFn meaning they can act as functions that look 
> > themselves up in a map. Strings are just strings. Replace "b" with 
> > (get "b") and you'll get the behavior you're looking for. 
> > 
> > Dave 
> > 
> > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Boris V. Schmid <boris.sch...@gmail.com> 
> wrote: 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > Can someone tell me what I'm overlooking (clojure 1.4) 
> > 
> > > (-> (hash-map :b (hash-map :a 3)) :b :a) 
> > > 3 
> > > user> (-> (hash-map "b" (hash-map :a 3)) "b" :a) 
> > > ; Evaluation aborted: java.lang.String cannot be cast to 
> clojure.lang.IFn 
> > 
> > > I'm not sure why the first can work, and the second cannot. Is it a 
> logical 
> > > limitation of the language, or an oversight in how the macro -> is 
> build? 
> > 
> > > -- 
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > > Groups "Clojure" group. 
> > > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com 
> > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient 
> with your 
> > > first post. 
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> > > For more options, visit this group at 
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to