On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:32 PM, David Jacobs <da...@wit.io> wrote: > I would love to have a version of doseq that works like map (similar to > "each" in other dynamic languages). In other words, instead of (doseq [log > logs] (println log)), I would say something like (each println logs).
Since that implies a side-effecting function, I'm curious as to how much that would really be needed in Clojure? -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
