This is all very nice but it seems to me to be a case of less is more (or more is less). I mean, if I am used to read inside out easily, this operator just makes my life harder. I don't plan to use it but unfortunately to understand other people's code, I have to switch mindset.
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 12:27 PM, fenton <fenton.trav...@gmail.com> wrote: > Noted and updated! Thx. > > > On Friday, June 8, 2012 11:02:50 AM UTC-7, fenton wrote: >> >> I created a tutorial explaining what the thrush -> and ->> operator is. >> >> https://github.com/ftravers/**PublicDocumentation/blob/** >> master/clojure-thrush.md<https://github.com/ftravers/PublicDocumentation/blob/master/clojure-thrush.md> >> >> My tutorials are aimed at people who appreciate VERY explicit >> explanations, which I think there is a bit of a gap among current internet >> available literature. >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
