That's a good point, it would make the API more idiomatic I suppose.

On 2012-06-11, at 01:45 , Baishampayan Ghose wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Dmitri <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The reason I'm using strings for values is to make it easier to work with
>> deserialized JSON. Currently I have it running as a service that our
>> internal applications send a JSON request and get a PDF document back.
> 
> Internally you can call `name` on the arguments, that way the user can
> pass in either a string or a keyword.
> 
> Regards,
> BG
> 
> -- 
> Baishampayan Ghose
> b.ghose at gmail.com
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to